Amazingly, a front page article in the NY Times this week (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/09/us/09wpa.html?pagewanted=2&sq=Green%20Hills&st=cse&scp=1) brought the question of public housing/public works into stark focus. First was the picture of Greenhills housing, itself. Very utilitarian and very familiar. Apparently, these and other New Deal architectural gems are being threatened by the bulldozer. Then here's what the great Robert Caro had to say:
“It’s ironic to be tearing (Greenhills) down just when America is going through
tough times again,” said the biographer Robert A. Caro, who wrote about the W.P.A. in “The Power Broker,” his book about the builder Robert Moses. “We should be preserving them and honoring them. They serve as monuments to the fact that it is possible to combine infrastructure with beauty"
tough times again,” said the biographer Robert A. Caro, who wrote about the W.P.A. in “The Power Broker,” his book about the builder Robert Moses. “We should be preserving them and honoring them. They serve as monuments to the fact that it is possible to combine infrastructure with beauty""Infrastructure with beauty" There's that word again, but you get the point. Public housing is indeed public works, with high purpose.
But just as these New Deal works are being threatened, we're threatening our public housing inheritance. Over 100,000 units have been demolished this last decade with only a fraction replaced. Many families and individuals have been dispersed with varying amounts of success. These are amazing facts when one considers the national shortage of affordable rental housing.
There's a growing sentiment that we must promote affordable housing production all across the country. And there's equal sentiment that we must require some form of "one for one" replacement when we're engaged in planned destruction of public housing units. Look for this Administration and Congress to be more prone to listen to these demands.

No comments:
Post a Comment